CASE STUDY

JD EXPRESS · 京东秒送

03

Store Page

Design

Redesigning the store page to reduce cognitive load in instant retail — where users

make purchase decisions within 30 seconds.

01

UX Designer

Store page system redesign

02

Instant Retail

JD Express · 京东秒送

03

Decision Research

30-second user window

04

3 Store Types

Food Delivery · Supermarket · Brand

BACKGROUND · 01

The store page is a decision

battlefield.

Many assume the store page is just a product list. In instant

retail, it is the moment where purchase decisions happen.

Users arrive with a problem — hunger, a forgotten item, an

emergency — and must decide within 30 seconds.

Data confirmed this: large volumes of bounce behavior

were occurring right inside the store page — not at the

search or category level, but at the moment of evaluation.

● KEY QUESTION

What role does the store page actually

play?

The store page is not a display surface — it is a

decision interface operating under extreme time pressure.

01 · FINDING

High Bounce Rate

Significant drop-off was happening inside the store page itself — users

were landing, evaluating, and leaving without converting.

02 · FINDING

30-Second Window

Users were completing — or abandoning — purchase decisions within 30

seconds of entering a store page.

03

Multi-tab Confusion

Users opened multiple store tabs to compare

— a signal the page wasn't providing enough

decision support.

04

Structural Mismatch

The page structure treated all store types

identically — mismatching the mental models

of very different user intentions.

05

Decision Without Resources

Critical decision inputs — delivery time, price

comparison, trust signals — were buried or

absent.

SYSTEM ANALYSIS · 02

Every visit is a decision

under pressure.

Users simultaneously resolve competing questions within 30 seconds — price, discounts, delivery time,

and trust. These are not sequential; they fire all at once.

How long is delivery?

Are there discounts?

Is this store

trustworthy?

More expensive than the

next?

Is it cheaper than other platforms?

How much can I actually save with this discount?

Are there any negative reviews?

Is it an official brand?

Users aren't browsing

They're making rapid purchase decisions

PROBLEM DISCOVERY · 03

Different decision-making logics

for different scenarios.

Three store types live inside JD Express — food delivery,

supermarket, and brand store. Each one carries a

fundamentally different purchase motivation, yet the

original page applied one unified information structure to all

three.

● CORE TENSION

Same structure.

Three different minds.

Each scenario demands a different information

architecture — yet all three lived inside the same

template.

FOOD DELIVERY

Quick Decision

Delivery Time

Best Sellers

Immediate satisfaction


FOOD DELIVERY

Value for Money

Delivery Time

Best Sellers

Immediate satisfaction


FOOD DELIVERY

Trust-Based Decision

Delivery Time

Best Sellers

Immediate satisfaction


USER PERSONAS · WHO USES WHAT

Three users. Three motivations.

Can our existing design serve three fundamentally different use scenarios?

01 · FOOD DELIVERY USER

Young People

Orders lunch from office, time-sensitive

Needs: speed clarity, delivery time,

popular dishes surfaced immediately

02 · FRESH MARKET USER

Middle-aged and older adults

Compares across multiple stores, price-

sensitive

Needs: price comparison, discount rules,

freshness indicators

03 · BRAND STORE USER

Quality-Seeking Parent

Shops for family, quality and authenticity

first

Needs: brand trust, product specs,

certifications, honest reviews

DESIGN CHALLENGE

How can we make the

design

afford the three different

users?

The core structural problem: a single page template that does not adapt to

fundamentally different decision-making models.

BEFORE INFORMATION STRUCTURE · 03.B

One structure, three decision models —

an inherent mismatch.

Before information structure

Using the same structure to support three

different decision-making models is inherently

illogical.

The original store page treated all three scenarios identically — top

navigation, store overview, category tabs, promotions, products,

checkout. Every user got the same layout regardless of what they

actually came to do.

Top Navigation Area

Store Overview

Category Tabs

Promotions Layer

Product Listing Cards

Checkout Bar

DESIGN SOLUTION · 04

The design objective is to

reduce decision-making costs.

A look at the first scenario — the JD Instant Delivery food category. Each redesign decision targets a

specific cognitive friction point in the user's 30-second decision window.

01 · FOOD DELIVERY SCENARIO

BEFORE

AFTER

Key signals within 3 seconds

Rating

Sales

User recognition (social proof)

Help users build trust

BEFORE

AFTER

Comprehensive transaction hub

The goal is no longer simply to “complete a food delivery order,” but to turn the store into a comprehensive transaction hub.

AFTER

BEFORE

AFTER

AFTER

The discount > Subsidy amount

Social proof design.

Best Seller in the Store

100K+ sold

9 people think it tastes great

It helps reduce decision anxiety and increases purchase confidence.

02 · FRESH MARKET SCENARIO

BEFORE

AFTER

AFTER

BEFORE

More compelling reasons for product decisions

Crisp and refreshing

Delicious texture

Juicy and succulent

Bursting with sweet and tangy flavor

Sweet and delicious

We’ve added taste descriptions and user reviews to the product cards, such as:

Reviews and sensory descriptions are more effective

Better suited for browsing when users don’t have a specific goal in mind:

Browse Best Sellers

Browse Discounts

Browse Seasonal Items

Browse Recommendations

Browse New Arrivals

Browse Fruit Platters

We’ve added taste descriptions and user reviews to the product cards, such as:

This will increase user engagement and make it easier to drive impulse purchases.

03 · Brand Store SCENARIO

BEFORE

AFTER

More expressive ratings

4.7 stars

“Elegant atmosphere”

Over 7,000 monthly sales

Value:

Review Tags (Elegant Ambiance)

Popularity (Over 7,000 monthly sales)

In this way, ratings have evolved from mere “numbers” into “trust signals with explanations.”

Price transparency facilitates better decision-making

Linking “price” and “business format” makes it easier for users to understand

“Per person” is not a standalone price point, but rather a benchmark for a restaurant's positioning.

Clearer selling points for the store

Free parking

Private rooms available

Value:

Shifting from “merchant-centric language” to “user-centric language”

REFLECTION · 05 · DESIGN IN INSTANT RETAIL

Design is not decoration.

It's a decision tool.

AN INNER QUESTION

05.A

In this project, I never sketched a single wireframe for decoration. What I actually did

was map cognitive tasks, analyze decision models, and build a structural system

that matches how different users think.

Looking back, I realized: I wasn't reorganizing information — I was designing the

architecture of a decision. The store page is not a canvas. It is a tool that helps

millions of people resolve uncertainty fast.

A NEW DEFINITION · 05.B

In instant retail, every second of hesitation

is a second closer to bounce.

Design's job is to eliminate hesitation. The deepest lesson from the store page project: design quality is not measured by how the

page looks, but by how quickly and confidently a user can decide.

01

Transparency

Clear pricing and discount logic eliminate

price-related hesitation before it forms.

02

Speed Signal

Visualized delivery time removes the

uncertainty that causes users to hesitate or

abandon.

03

Context Match

Adaptive structure aligned to each store type

meets users where their mental model

already is.